### 1. Command

$ npx news mark-cuban-healthcare-hypothetical --verbose

### 2. Output

INFO: Initializing `healthcare_logic_simulation.sh`...

INFO: User input detected: If care costs $10/year AND doctors get double pay, would you support universal care? This hypothetical was designed to strip away common financial objections.

DEBUG: Analyzing `MarkCuban_Hypothesis_v1.0.0` for logical integrity. The goal was to determine if non-monetary factors would prevent consensus, even under optimal conditions.

WARN: High probability of `IdeologyException` in user response handler. Previous `public_opinion` modules consistently encountered this exception.

+------------------------------------------------+
| SYSTEM ALERT: LOGIC BOMB DETECTED IN DISCUSSION|
|       `MONEY_AND_COMPENSATION_ELIMINATED`      |
|                                                |
|    Expected: Rational Consensus                |
|    Found:    `ARGUMENT_BUFFER_OVERFLOW`        |
+------------------------------------------------+

INFO: Cuban's `CostPlusDrugs` initiative cited as precedent for price optimization. He believes "the system" is rigged, favoring middlemen over providers and patients.

DEBUG: Input parameter `cost_per_person` set to `10.00 USD/year`. This parameter was chosen to be negligibly low, challenging the cost-as-barrier argument.

DEBUG: Input parameter `provider_compensation_multiplier` set to `2.0x`. This ensures provider satisfaction is not an issue within the simulation.

ERROR: Unexpected `LOGIC_GATE_FAILURE` in `public_opinion_module`. Some users questioned the feasibility, stating:

"Why couldn't each person just pay their own $10?"

This implies a resistance to collective funding, even at minimal individual cost, highlighting a deeper philosophical divide.

WARN: Conflicting economic models detected. A common counter-argument was:

"Can you show me a single industry where doubling wages led to lower costs?"

This query implicitly challenges the core premise of the hypothetical's economic assumptions.

INFO: Cuban's intent: to test if financial barriers (cost, provider pay) are the sole blockers for universal healthcare adoption. He aimed to isolate the ideological component from economic concerns.

DEBUG: Hypothesis summary: Eliminate `FINANCIAL_OBSTACLES`, observe `IDEOLOGICAL_RESISTANCE`. The experiment successfully demonstrated this resistance.

INFO: Results indicate a mix of `DEFENSIVENESS`, `ECONOMIC_PUSHBACK`, and `QUIET_AGREEMENT`. The `IdeologyException` was, indeed, triggered as predicted, revealing complex human response patterns.

### 3. Stacktrace (If This News Were Code)

ERROR: `healthcareSystem.evaluateHypothetical()` crashed due to `IdeologyMismatchException`. The system encountered a fundamental incompatibility between proposed optimal conditions and existing belief systems.

at com.npxnews.healthcare.simulation.PolicyEngine.runHypothetical(PolicyEngine.java:78)
at com.npxnews.healthcare.simulation.UserResponseProcessor.process(UserResponseProcessor.java:152)
at com.npxnews.healthcare.api.HealthcareAPI.handleRequest(HealthcareAPI.java:42)
at com.npxnews.main.NPXNewsApp.main(NPXNewsApp.java:10)
Caused by: com.npxnews.exceptions.IdeologyMismatchException:
Expected: `RationalChoiceBasedOnOptimalParameters`
Found:    `DeeplyIngrainedSocioPoliticalBias`
    at com.npxnews.healthcare.simulation.DecisionMatrix.resolve(DecisionMatrix.java:301)
    at com.npxnews.healthcare.simulation.PolicyEngine.runHypothetical(PolicyEngine.java:71)

The system received optimal financial parameters for a universal healthcare model, yet encountered a critical error in UserResponseProcessor. The PolicyEngine tried to apply pure logic where only pre-existing political frameworks existed. Panic! The IdeologyMismatchException indicates that even with all financial incentives aligned, fundamental disagreements persist, preventing a clean System.exit(0). This demonstrates the complexity of human decision-making beyond simple economics.

### 4. Patch Notes

• - REMOVED: The argument that universal healthcare is too expensive, replaced by the argument that it's ideologically undesirable. This shift in discourse reveals underlying systemic issues.
• - ADDED: New `hypothetical_scenario` feature to highlight core disagreements in public policy discussions. This allows for more targeted analysis of societal values.
• - FIXED: Misconception that doctors are overpaid; Cuban's model assumes double their current wages, thus removing provider compensation as a barrier.
• - WARN: `MiddlemanProfitLoophole` still causing systemic inefficiencies in real-world implementations, despite efforts to streamline.
• - DEBUG: Human logic parsing remains unpredictable, even under ideal conditions. Further research into `cognitive_bias_modules` is recommended.